First blog post

-
Hello and welcome to my government blog! 😊

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Should Globalism Be a Dirty Word?

-
Image
Alex Jones, a far-right conspiratorial political pundit, is a frequent detractor of globalism. This belief is often repeated across the Republican party, and even with some Democrats. There is a dirty word going around the Republican party and even some parts of the Democratic party: globalism. Republicans in Congress frequently disavow so-called “globalist policies” implemented by Democratic politicians, and those of the far right paint their enemies with the often-anti-Semitic pejorative of “globalist”. But globalism should not be looked at with such disdain. In fact, the U.S. government would do good to implement true globalist policies for the benefit of the U.S. and the world.  First, we should define what we mean by “globalism”. The term refers to a perspective of national policymaking that considers its effect on a global scale. For instance, when a country is having economic issues that could be partly allayed by tariffs on global imports, a country would consider...
Read more

The Government is Fine, You Aren't

-
Image
Ask any citizen of the United States, either on the left or right of the political spectrum, to lay out their list of government grievances, and you’ll soon realize that the list is almost unending. Indeed, it is practically a national pastime to blame the U.S. government for our multitude of problems. Healthcare, immigration, climate change, etc. are all issues current and past governments have floundered to address. Yet, while it may be common to use this line of thinking, it masks a deeper and more vexing issue underneath: that if the American public really wanted to solve these problems, they could. Indeed, the frequent adjustment of our founding document gives a clue of the potential for radical change in the United States. Furthermore, the public has never had more power when it comes to directly changing their situation through election of officials. When it comes to discussions of governance, the public often looks to the Constitution for guidance. It is the refere...
Read more

Trump's National Emergency is Harmful to the Rule of Law... and Good Optics.

-
Image
Trump's use of a national emergency to fund the border wall could run into legal issues, not to mention its damaging implications for the rule of law At the time of writing, the news has just broken that President Donald Trump will use the emergency powers of the presidency to attempt to fund a concrete or steel barrier at the southern border. After a tumultuous and economically harmful government shutdown last month over this proposed border, Trump had failed to achieve his demand for border wall funding. It seemed plausible that he would acquiesce to a new bipartisan compromise, that included no wall funding, cooked up by a congressional committee to deal with the issue of border security. However, It appears that, even though he will likely sign the negotiated deal, he will still attempt to use his emergency powers. But if the president decides that he must use the emergency powers vested in him by the Constitution to achieve political ends, what’s so wrong with that? ...
Read more